Will Loretta Sanchez Support Devastating Energy Tax?
California Families Would Suffer from Skyrocketing Home Heating Costs Under "Cap-and-Tax"
Washington - Despite Democrats' promises to deliver tax relief to families who need it the most, the recent budget proposal from the White House includes a "cap-and-trade" provision that should more appropriately be named the "cap-and-tax" provision, because if it became law it would raise energy taxes on every single person who flips on a light switch.
As Congress takes the President's federal budget under consideration, California families deserve to know if Rep. Loretta Sanchez (D-CA) would support such a devastating energy tax proposal.
The cap-and-tax proposal made by President Obama would drastically increase electricity rates for every American, causing additional hardships for already struggling California families. A new analysis shows that electricity rates could rise by as much as $4.6 billion per year, costing a California family of four approximately an additional $505 per year.
NRCC Communications Director Ken Spain asks, "Will Loretta Sanchez put partisan allegiances ahead of struggling workers and support a fiscally irresponsible cap-and-tax proposal that will increase energy bills, raise taxes and overwhelm the budgets of American families? The last thing that American families need to worry about right now is whether they will be able to cool their homes this summer or keep their families warm next winter."
Families in California would be even more drastically affected, as so many families' homes are heated with expensive fuels:
MIT researchers released an "Assessment of U.S. Cap-and-Trade Proposals," which shows that the increase would be an increase of more than $3,000 a year for each household. (A Report of the MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Climate Change; Assessment of U.S. Cap and Trade Proposals; http://web.mit.edu/globalchange/www/MITJPSPGC_Rpt146.pdf.)
What’s more disturbing is that low-income families would take the hardest hit from this "cap-and-tax" proposal:
Testimony from the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) revealed that, "The rise in prices would impose a larger burden, relative to income, on low-income households than on high-income households for two reasons. First, low-income households spend a much larger fraction of their income than do high-income households. In addition, energy-intensive items compose a greater share of low-income households’ total expenditures." (CBO Congressional Testimony; The Distributional Consequences of a Cap-and-Trade Program for CO2 Emissions. http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/100xx/doc10018/03-12-ClimateChange_Testimony.1.1.shtml)
(Source: House Committee on Ways and Means Republican Staff, Analysis of Annual Increase in Electricity Costs, http://www.republicans.waysandmeans.house.gov/showarticle.asp?ID=539, 3/26/09)
Washington - Despite Democrats' promises to deliver tax relief to families who need it the most, the recent budget proposal from the White House includes a "cap-and-trade" provision that should more appropriately be named the "cap-and-tax" provision, because if it became law it would raise energy taxes on every single person who flips on a light switch.
As Congress takes the President's federal budget under consideration, California families deserve to know if Rep. Loretta Sanchez (D-CA) would support such a devastating energy tax proposal.
The cap-and-tax proposal made by President Obama would drastically increase electricity rates for every American, causing additional hardships for already struggling California families. A new analysis shows that electricity rates could rise by as much as $4.6 billion per year, costing a California family of four approximately an additional $505 per year.
NRCC Communications Director Ken Spain asks, "Will Loretta Sanchez put partisan allegiances ahead of struggling workers and support a fiscally irresponsible cap-and-tax proposal that will increase energy bills, raise taxes and overwhelm the budgets of American families? The last thing that American families need to worry about right now is whether they will be able to cool their homes this summer or keep their families warm next winter."
Families in California would be even more drastically affected, as so many families' homes are heated with expensive fuels:
MIT researchers released an "Assessment of U.S. Cap-and-Trade Proposals," which shows that the increase would be an increase of more than $3,000 a year for each household. (A Report of the MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Climate Change; Assessment of U.S. Cap and Trade Proposals; http://web.mit.edu/globalchange/www/MITJPSPGC_Rpt146.pdf.)
What’s more disturbing is that low-income families would take the hardest hit from this "cap-and-tax" proposal:
Testimony from the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) revealed that, "The rise in prices would impose a larger burden, relative to income, on low-income households than on high-income households for two reasons. First, low-income households spend a much larger fraction of their income than do high-income households. In addition, energy-intensive items compose a greater share of low-income households’ total expenditures." (CBO Congressional Testimony; The Distributional Consequences of a Cap-and-Trade Program for CO2 Emissions. http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/100xx/doc10018/03-12-ClimateChange_Testimony.1.1.shtml)
(Source: House Committee on Ways and Means Republican Staff, Analysis of Annual Increase in Electricity Costs, http://www.republicans.waysandmeans.house.gov/showarticle.asp?ID=539, 3/26/09)
posted by Ron Nehring at
12:19 PM
<< Home